Tel
+852-61343425
High-chair product safety testing should separate general workmanship review, order-specific on-site checks, defect classification, sampling decisions, and laboratory compliance testing. We inspect the selected samples against the approved working instruction, product specification, approved sample, technical file, and buyer inspection instruction assigned to the order.
The numerical conditions in this article are derived from the UTS Working Instruction for High Chair & Booster Seat, Issue 01, dated January 1, 2025. They apply only when that working instruction or another buyer-approved document is assigned to the inspected model and order. A force, mass, probe, holding time, operating cycle, fixture, application point, or acceptance condition must not be transferred to another configuration without confirmation.
Where the approved defect classification identifies a hazardous condition, accessible small part, exposed sharp point or sharp edge, failed restraint, unintended lock release, or failed safety-related component as critical, we record it according to that classification. On-site inspection does not replace certification, destination-market regulatory evaluation, or laboratory testing.
The report records the sample identification, product configuration, test setup, application point, applied condition, observed result, affected checked samples, and available photographic or measurement evidence. Shipment release remains the buyer’s decision.
Stability inspection evaluates the assembled high chair under the conditions defined in the approved working instruction. The applicable checks may include tray stability, sideways and rearward stability, forward stability, footrest or horizontal-member loading, and a separate seat-back static-load check.
Before testing, we assemble and adjust the high chair according to the approved product instructions. The required legs, feet, tray, seat, fasteners, backrest, footrest, restraint components, adjustment parts, and locking mechanisms must be installed in the intended positions.
| Inspection Check | Working Instruction Condition | Application Point |
|---|---|---|
| Tray stability | 200 N for 1 minute | Midpoint of the tray centre line |
| Sideways stability | 150 N for 1 minute | Test beam positioned 140 mm horizontally outward from the inside edge of one arm or lateral protection |
| Rearward stability | 150 N for 1 minute | Test beam positioned 140 mm horizontally outward from the most forward point supported by the backrest |
| Forward stability | 5 kg test mass and 25 N horizontal force for 1 minute | Mass centred on the seat; force applied at the uppermost front part of the high chair |
| Footrest or horizontal-member loading | 200 N for 1 minute | 25 mm from the applicable outer edge |
For the forward-stability procedure, the working instruction uses a 5 kg test mass with a diameter of 100 mm. The mass is placed on the centre line of the seat with its centre of gravity 80 mm from the front edge. Where the seat front edge is flexible, its position is established while applying a 5 N inward force. A 25 N horizontal force is then applied gradually at the uppermost front part of the high chair and maintained for one minute.
During each applicable check, we record sliding, rocking, lifting at a floor-contact point, lock release, visible cracking, separation, deformation, or overturning. These observations are reported separately. We do not assign an unsupported technical cause such as incorrect material or structural weakness without additional evidence.
The seat-back static-load check evaluates the backrest, frame, adjustment mechanism, and supporting connections under the sustained rearward force defined in the working instruction.
| Test Item | Working Instruction Requirement |
|---|---|
| Backrest position | Middle adjustment position, or the most upright position when only two positions are available |
| Base condition | Secured according to the approved procedure |
| Loading pad | 100 mm diameter |
| Applied force | 100 N rearward |
| Application point | Centre of the backrest, 50 mm below the top edge |
| Holding time | 1 hour |
Before loading, we photograph the relevant backrest, frame, hinges, brackets, tubes, rivets, fasteners, welds, molded joints, and adjustment locks. Pre-existing cracks, deformation, looseness, coating damage, or assembly differences should be recorded before the test begins.
After the force is removed, we operate the backrest and adjustment mechanism again. A component that remains attached but no longer adjusts or locks according to the approved requirement is recorded as a functional finding.
The assembled high chair is placed on the flat surface required by the approved method. We record the initial condition before pressing, twisting, or manually changing the frame position.
| Inspection Area | Check | Possible Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Legs and support points | Alignment, deformation, and floor contact | Rocking, raised support point, bending, or unequal positioning |
| Rivets, screws, and fasteners | Presence, seating, and visible security | Loose, missing, displaced, or incorrectly installed fastening |
| Welded joints | Attachment and visible finish | Loose, incomplete, sharp, unfinished, or damaged joint |
| Frame coating | Coverage and visible condition | Peeling, cracking, corrosion, or exposed base material |
| Folding and adjustment locks | Engagement, retention, and release operation | Incomplete locking, jamming, or unintended release |
Product dimensions and weight are checked against the approved specification and its stated tolerances where those items are included in the inspection scope. Actual results should be entered in the applicable test or data-measurement section of the inspection report.
The restraint system should remain attached, adjustable, and secure after the loading and component-operation checks defined for the inspected order. The working instruction applies 150 N to each applicable restraint-system point and anchorage point, including waist, crotch, and shoulder-belt positions where present. The force is reached within five seconds and maintained for one minute.
We review the complete load path from the restraint webbing into the seat shell, frame, bracket, anchor plate, sewn connection, or other approved attachment structure.
| Test Parameter | Working Instruction Requirement |
|---|---|
| Applied force | 150 N |
| Time to reach force | Within 5 seconds |
| Holding time | 1 minute |
| Applicable points | Restraint system and anchorage points, including waist, crotch, and shoulder belt where present |
Before loading, we confirm that each strap is routed through the intended slot, each anchor is fully engaged, and the webbing is not visibly twisted or incorrectly assembled. Where protective covers form part of the approved construction, they should be present and secure before and after the check.
Where the approved classification treats an exposed small part, sharp point, sharp edge, failed anchorage, or removed protective cover as critical, we record the condition accordingly. We do not describe the on-site team as making the buyer’s shipment-release decision.
Where the applicable high-chair buckle or fastening component is included in the working instruction, it is opened and closed for 20 cycles according to the product operating instructions. The working instruction does not establish a universal numerical buckle-release force for this article, so no unrelated release-force threshold is introduced.
After the cycle sequence and applicable restraint loading, the buckle should continue to engage and release according to the product instructions. We record incomplete engagement, unintended release, a release control that does not return, housing damage, webbing pull-through, or inability to re-engage the buckle.
Before loading, the webbing position may be marked near adjustment fittings and anchorage points so that visible movement can be identified after the test.
| Component | Approved Check | Condition Recorded |
|---|---|---|
| Waist restraint | 150 N reached within 5 seconds and held for 1 minute | Breakage, slippage, elongation, or anchor movement |
| Crotch restraint | 150 N reached within 5 seconds and held for 1 minute | Seam opening, slot damage, displacement, or detachment |
| Shoulder restraint | 150 N reached within 5 seconds and held for 1 minute where fitted | Webbing damage, anchor movement, or fitting deformation |
The review covers more than complete strap breakage. We record webbing narrowing, fraying, yarn damage, permanent movement through an adjuster, stitch separation, buckle-loop distortion, anchor-slot widening, and damage caused by an unfinished rigid edge. Separate seam or protective-component tension checks should be reported under their own working-instruction items rather than presented as universal strap-strength criteria.
After the approved restraint checks, we operate the harness again and confirm whether the belts remain adjustable, the buckle remains functional, and the applicable anchorage points remain in the approved condition.
Entrapment inspection should distinguish the specific movable finger-gap screening method in the working instruction from head, neck, torso, limb, cord, suffocation, and other hazards that may require different probes, fixtures, or laboratory criteria. The 50 N, 12 mm, and 5 mm sequence below applies only to the defined finger-entrapment condition.
Finger-gap review is performed after the high chair has been assembled and placed in the product position required by the approved procedure. Applicable gaps may change during folding, adjustment, tray movement, backrest movement, footrest movement, frame movement, or operation of a latch or powered mechanism.
Appearance inspection may also identify sharp points, sharp edges, loose components, open seams, cords, or other visible hazards. These are recorded separately and are not assessed through the 5 mm and 12 mm probe logic unless the approved instruction requires that method.
The working instruction uses a 50 N force to create or close the applicable movable gap. The force is maintained while the same gap is checked with the 12 mm and 5 mm probes.
| Probe Result | Assessment Under the Approved Finger-Gap Procedure |
|---|---|
| 12 mm probe enters the applicable gap | Acceptable only for the applicable movable finger gap under this procedure |
| 12 mm probe does not enter, but the 5 mm probe enters | Nonconforming for the applicable movable finger gap |
| Neither the 12 mm nor the 5 mm probe enters | Acceptable only for the applicable movable finger gap under this procedure |
The report identifies the product position, force direction, application point, probe results, affected sample, and supporting photographs. A measured gap dimension should be recorded only when the approved method requires or permits dimensional measurement.
For a seat-to-leg gap or another movable joint included in the approved finger-entrapment scope, we apply the specified force in the defined direction and complete the probe sequence without releasing the force. Releasing the force before the probe check may allow the gap to change and may not represent the defined test condition.
| Mechanism Condition | Inspection Focus |
|---|---|
| Fully folded | Exposed slots, uncovered joints, and accessible rough or sharp areas |
| During movement | Closing gaps, scissoring members, and accessible finger positions |
| Fully open | Lock engagement and applicable accessible gaps |
| Under the approved force | Change in the applicable gap and probe result |
| After operation | Loose pivots, displaced covers, and visible alignment changes |
Only components present on the inspected model and included in the approved instruction should be operated for a stated cycle quantity. Requirements for absent zippers, snaps, hook-and-loop fasteners, clasps, or other components must not be transferred to the product.
The inspection report supports the buyer’s shipment review but does not create an automatic release, rejection, correction, or reinspection decision. The buyer should compare each result with the approved working instruction, specification, approved sample, defect classification, acceptance criteria, and destination-market requirements applicable to the order.
| Review Point | What the Buyer Should Confirm |
|---|---|
| Test source | Each force, mass, probe, cycle quantity, holding time, sample level, and acceptance condition is supported by an approved document |
| Product configuration | The checked sample was assembled, adjusted, and positioned as required |
| Application method | The load, direction, fixture, probe, and application point match the approved procedure |
| Defect classification | Critical, major, and minor findings are assigned according to the approved classification |
| Evidence | The photographs and measurements show the setup, product position, application point, and reported result |
| Corrective status | Supplier correction, separation, permitted recheck, and unresolved findings are clearly recorded |
| Further action | Confirm whether reinspection, laboratory evaluation, clarification, sorting, repair, or another buyer-approved action is required |
Our office team and project service team coordinate report communication and required follow-up with the client. The buyer uses the documented findings to decide whether the order should be corrected, held for clarification, evaluated further, checked again, or reviewed for shipment release under the approved requirements.